Posted in Chit Chat

On finishing a book and thinking “if it were me, I would have done it like this…”

Sometimes I’ll close the cover on a book and the writer part of me will instantly flick the cap off a ballpoint pen and just ITCH to make changes.

giphy (25)

Literally, just like that. That cat is my spirit animal. This isn’t because I thought the book was pants, or because I think I can do it any better. It’s simply a “if it were me” kind of imagining. Does that make sense?

A bit of background info here:

I used to write reviews in a simple way where I would split it between ‘what worked’ and ‘what didn’t work’.

However, I always felt somewhat uncomfortable with the ‘what didn’t work’ section. It seemed too negative to me.  It made me wonder if it came across as harsh or too critical. Whatevs. It just was not sitting right with me.

So I ditched that format altogether.

giphy (26)

This open-plan formula wasn’t working for me either though. If I’m given too much space to roam in I will get lost. I will literally ramble on.

I don’t care how anyone else works; I need parameters, expectations and fences. Yes, people. I need a damn box.

So I’ve been trying to be conscious of the things I think about when I read. And what struck me time and time again was how often I’d feel a “well, if that were me, I’d totally start the book here, and not there” or a “this book could have been longer” vibe.

If any of you have read a lot of my reviews you will have noticed how often I harp on about ‘potential’. I do this SO MUCH on Goodreads too.

With this in mind, I’ve decided to write my reviews loosely based around these headers:

  1. INITIAL GUT REACTION – first thoughts and a chance to get any fangirling (mostly) out of the way.
  2. WHAT WORKED FOR ME – a place to rave about everything I loved in a book.
  3. “IF IT WERE ME” – a section where I can talk about the things I might change if I were given this book to write. It’s not me saying I could do a better job, or that the book would be anything more than it already is. But it is a way of me exploring parts that did not work for me without feeling like I’m slamming it.
  4. CONCLUSION – in a nutshell.

Sure, there’s only a subtle difference between the old and the new way, however I feel more comfortable with it. Because who am I to say what doesn’t work in a book? It’s a very personal reaction when you read something.

I hope this sorta makes sense. Please do feel free to holler at me. Call me a nut. It’s cool.

How do you handle the less than positive segments in your reviews?




YA writer. Epic reader. Professional procrastinator.

5 thoughts on “On finishing a book and thinking “if it were me, I would have done it like this…”

  1. If it is a book I didn’t really enjoy or feel like the execution should have been better, I do the “if it had been me writing it” approach. I don’t really elaborate it though because I keep my reviews spoiler free and it’s hard to explain certain plot lines without giving it away–but sometimes I give in and hide the spoiler. It’s like leaving my little rant somewhere to make me feel better.

  2. I love this blog and post and was wondering if you could possibly check my little one out (and possibly give it a follow wink wink) dw if not but it’d be amazing! xx

Talk to me!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s